CHAPTER 19
HEALTH
19.I BASIC FEATURES OF THE SECTOR
19.I.1 Health Conditions of the Population
19.I.1.1 One of the most unfortunate consequences of Guyana’s
economic decline in the 1970s and 1980s was that it led to very poor health
conditions for a large part of the population.
19.I.1.2 Compared to other neighbouring countries, Guyana ranks
poorly in regard to basic health indicators. In 1998, life expectancy at birth
was estimated at 66.0 for Guyana, 71.6 for Suriname, 72.9 for Venezuela; 73.8
for Trinidad and Tobago, 74.7 for Jamaica, and 76.5 for Barbados. In Guyana, the
infant mortality rate in 1998 was 24.2, in Barbados 14.9; in Trinidad and Tobago
16.2; in Venezuela 22; in Jamaica 24.5; and in Suriname 25.1.
19.I.1.3 Maternal mortality rates in Guyana are also relatively
high, being estimate at 124.6 for 1998. Comparable figures for other Caribbean
countries are 50 for Barbados, 75 for Trinidad and 100 for Jamaica.
19.I.1.4 It must be emphasized, however, that although Guyana’s
health profile still suffers in comparison with most of the Caribbean, there has
been remarkable progress between 1988 and 1998
19.I.1.5 In Guyana the leading causes of mortality for children
under the age of one are: certain conditions originating in the prenatal period
(46.9%); intestinal infectious diseases (15.6%); congenital anomalies (10.4%);
diseases of the respiratory system (6.7%); nutritional deficiencies 5.8%);
bacterial diseases (4.0%); diseases of the blood and the blood-forming organs
(2.0%); endocrine and metabolic disease immunity disorders (1.8%); accidents
(1.6%); and diseases of the Nervous System (1.1%).
19.I.1.6 The leading causes of mortality for all age groups are
cerebrovascular diseases (11.6%); ischemic heart disease (9.9%); immunity
disorders (7.1%); diseases of the respiratory system (6.8%); diseases of
pulmonary circulation and other forms of heart disease (6.6%); endocrine and
metabolic diseases (5.5%); diseases of other parts of the Digestive System
(5.2%); violence (5.1%); certain condition originating in the prenatal period
(4.3%); and hypertensive diseases (3.9%).
19.I.1.7 The picture in regard to morbidity patterns differs.
The ten leading causes of morbidity for all age groups are, in decreasing order:
malaria; acute respiratory infections; symptoms, signs and ill defined or
unknown conditions; hypertension; accident and injuries; acute diarrhoeal
disease; diabetes mellitus; worm infestation; rheumatic arthritis; and mental
and nervous disorders.
19.I.1.8 This morbidity profile indicates that it can be
improved substantially through enhanced preventive health care, better education
on health issues, more widespread access to potable water and sanitation
services, and increased access to basic health care of good quality.
19.I.1.9 Poor environmental health is in part responsible for
the seriousness of vector borne diseases, including malaria, filaria and dengue
fever. Malaria is endemic and represents the major cause of morbidity in Regions
1, 7, 8, which are also among the poorest areas of Guyana. Filaria is endemic
along the coastal strips, and dengue fever is prevalent especially also in the
coastal area. In general, diseases spread by vectors and those associated with
environmental problems show the most rapid rates of increase.
19.I.1.10 The high incidence of dental caries can be addressed
through preventive and conservation care, including oral education. This
incidence is influenced by the lack of qualified dentists. Moreover, public
interventions have been confined to emergency care, especially to extractions,
the state providing little or no curative and conservation treatments.
19.I.1.11 Although cancer is becoming an increasingly serious
health issue for Guyanese, there is no system of diagnosis. This, of course,
impedes a sensible appreciation of the magnitude of the problem. However, the
incidence of cervical cancer appears to be rising among the female population,
even though its impact could be reduced by preventive actions such as early
detection. Smear tests are taken in Georgetown, Linden, and New Amsterdam. Most
of the women whose test was positive could have reduced the severity of their
condition through earlier detection and cure. At present there is no oncologist
in Guyana, and the assessment of the urgency of each cancer case is very often
not accurate. A Cancer Board, which is in the process of drafting a national
cancer programme, was established in September 1998.
19.I.1.12 There are significant differences in the incidence
and patterns of morbidity by Region. This is due in part to the geographical
isolation of some communities and the attendant difficulties of delivering
equipment and services to them, and in part to the fact that the deterioration
of health infrastructure mainly affected the most remote communities. The
Regions with the lowest overall morbidity rates are Regions 3, 4, 6 and 10.
However, the reliability and completeness of the data are not uniform across
regions, and are especially poor in areas where there are no health clinics, or
where clinics are poorly staffed and statistics poorly reported. Hinterland
areas are often the least accessible both by river and by air, and suffer from a
lack of basic infrastructure and facilities, such as electricity and potable
water, which makes the delivery of certain services a difficult task.
19.I.1.13 While malaria is mainly responsible for the high
rates of morbidity in the hinterland, food accessibility and availability vary
across regions. Moreover, the nature of the most pressing health concerns varies
by population group. An analysis of disease patterns and other socio-economic
variables has revealed particular groups and areas of vulnerability, namely: 1)
women’s health; 2) children’s health; 3) people affected by STDs/AIDS; 4) people
affected by mental health problems and drug abuse; 5) disabled people; 6)
elderly people; and 7) the Amerindians.
19.I.1.14 The incidence of HIV/AIDS has grown almost
exponentially in recent years. Indeed, the impact of this ailment could have
extremely serious and deleterious effects on the individual, on the population
as a whole, on the development of the economy, and on the social stability of
the nation. Indeed, it is estimated that if the present trend is not reversed,
life expectancy in Guyana could be reduced to 52 years by as early as 2010, and
that 50% of the AIDS cases would be concentrated in the 10 to 24 age group.
19.I.1.15 Amerindians represent one of the most vulnerable
groups to health issues. Their conditions are particularly difficult in respect
of malaria, acute respiratory diseases, water borne diseases,
nutritional deficiencies, and access to health care.
19.I.2 Environmental Risks to Health
19.I.2.1 Air pollution is mainly derived from the
blowing of bauxite dust and the spraying of pesticides in the canefields,
however their effects have not been investigated thoroughly.
19.I.2.2 Bacteriological contamination of water
continues to occur in the distribution system and often surface water is used
without treatment or disinfecting facilities. Moreover the high concentration of
soluble organic matter encourages the rapid growth of bacteria.
19.I.2.3 Basic sanitation is poor. Sanitary
conditions are dismal in squatter areas, many of which have no hygienic means of
waste disposal. New housing schemes, factories, commercial institutions and
industries have been developed without complying with the existing land
development laws. In fact, individual septic tanks and pit latrines are often
the only means of sewage disposal and are frequently not constructed at the
recommended distance from the water supply.
19.I.2.4 The current housing stock is inadequate.
Overcrowding in buildings is therefore common. This encourages the transmission
of obstructive pulmonary and other communicable diseases. Furthermore, the lack
of housing has encouraged the expansion of squatting areas.
19.I.2.5 In the work environment several health
risks are prevalent. Most injuries occur in agricultural occupations, followed
by the manufacturing and mining sectors. In the agricultural sector, the main
risks to health are also derived from the use of pesticides. Moreover, workers
in the rice and sugar industries have been recorded as sufferiing from silicosis
and bagassosis. Silicosis, dermatitis, hearing loss, heat stress and diseases
related to the absence of proper ventilation affect workers in the mining
industry.
19.I.2.6 In the home, domestic violence
represents a major health problem in Guyana, causing physical harm and damaging
mental health.
19.I.2.7 Food contamination also constitutes an important
health risk. Despite Government regulations and food inspection programmes, the
chemical contamination of food continues to occur. Enforcement mechanisms are
weak.
19.I.3 The Health Care System
19.I.3.1 The delivery of health services is provided at five
different levels in the public sector:
19.I.3.2 Level I: Local Health Posts (166 in total) that
provide preventive and simple curative care for common diseases and attempt to
promote proper health practices. Community health workers staff
them.
19.I.3.3 Level II: Health Centres (109 in total) that
provide preventive and rehabilitative care and promotion activities. These are
ideally staffed with a medical extension worker or public health nurse, along
with a nursing assistant, a dental nurse and a midwife.
19.I.3.4 Level III: Nineteen District Hospitals (with 473
beds) that provide basic in-patient and outpatient care (although more the
latter than the former) and selected diagnostic services. They are also meant to
be equipped to provide simple radiological and laboratory services, and to be
capable of providing preventive and curative dental care. They are designed to
serve geographical areas with populations of 10,000 or more.
19.I.3.5 Level IV: Four Regional Hospitals (with 620
beds) that provide emergency services, routine surgery and obstetrical and
gynaecological care, dental services, diagnostic services and specialist
services in general medicine and paediatrics. They are designed to include the
necessary support for this level of medical service in terms of laboratory and
X-ray facilities, pharmacies and dietetic expertise. These hospitals are located
in Regions 2, 3, 6 and 10.
19.I.3.6 Level V: The National Referral Hospital (937
beds) in Georgetown that provides a wider range of diagnostic and specialist
services, on both an in-patient and out-patient basis; the Psychiatric Hospital
in Canje; and the Geriatric Hospital in Georgetown. There is also one children’s
rehabilitation centre.
19.I.3.7 This system is structured so that its proper
functioning depends intimately on a process of referrals. Except for serious
emergencies, patients are to be seen first at the lower levels, and those with
problems that cannot be treated at those levels are referred to higher levels in
the system. However, in practice, many patients by-pass the lower levels.
19.I.3.8 The health sector is currently unable to offer certain
sophisticated tertiary services and specialised medical services, the technology
for which is unaffordable in Guyana, or for which the required medical
specialists simply do not exist. Even with substantial improvements in the
health sector, the need for overseas treatment for some services might remain.
The Ministry of Health provides financial assistance to patients requiring such
treatment, priority being given to children whose condition can be rehabilitated
with significant improvements to their quality of life.
19.I.3.9 In addition to the facilities mentioned above, there
are 10 hospitals belonging to the private sector and to public corporations,
plus diagnostic facilities, clinics and dispensaries in those sectors. These 10
hospitals together, provide for 548 beds.
19.I.3.10 Eighteen clinics and dispensaries are owned by
GUYSUCO.
19.I.3.11 The Ministry of Health and Labour is responsible for
the funding of the National Referral Hospital in Georgetown, which has recently
been made a public corporation managed by an independent Board. Region 6 is
responsible for the management of the National Psychiatric Hospital. The
Geriatric Hospital, previously administered by the Ministry of Labour, became
the responsibility of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security in
December 1997.
19.I.3.12 The facilities at the other levels receive their
funding from the Ministry of Local Government. In each of the Regions there is a
Regional Health Officer reporting to higher levels of the Ministry of Health on
professional and technical matters. The Regional governments are responsible for
health care within their boundaries, and administrative control over health
resources rests with the Regional Executive Officer.
19.I.3.13 The Ministry of Health is responsible for
establishing and implementing health policy and standards, accrediting
facilities, and identifying the human resource requirements of the sector
throughout the country. It has responsibility for the procurement and
distribution of pharmaceuticals and medical supplies in all regions. It funds
and manages the vertical health programmes, including vector control,
rehabilitation services, dental care, mental health programmes, Hansen’s
disease, AIDS, and alcohol and drug abuse.
19.I.3.14 The possibilities of confusion and overlapping among
these agencies are obvious. Indeed they often occur.
19.I.3.15 Recent proposals for reforming the Regional system by
creating Regional Health Authorities have been advanced and approved by Cabinet.
However implementation modalities have not been thoroughly discussed. Under the
new system, the Ministry of Health and Labour will not be responsible for
day-to-day management and service delivery, but it will have responsibility only
for policy formulation, regulation, planning, standard setting, monitoring and
evaluation.
19.I.3.16 The personnel in the system include 336 doctors
(190 within the public sector), 1597 registered nurses, 127 Medex
officers (medical extension workers who are qualified as nurses and have 18
months of clinical training), 133 community health workers, 80 pharmacists (3
public, 77 private), 24 environmental health officers, and 27 dentists. There is
heavy reliance on overseas personnel in some disciplines. For example, more than
90 percent of the specialist medical staff in the public sector are expatriates.
Many medical personnel in the public sector also work in the private sector, and
some observers have noted a neglect of their duties in the former, in favour of
the latter.
19.I.3.17 In the public health sector the staff vacancy rates
range between 25 and 50 percent in most categories. Moreover, imbalances exist
in terms of staff distribution: almost 70 percent of the doctors are located in
Georgetown, where one-quarter of the population lives. In rural areas and in
some specialisations such as pharmacy, laboratory technology, radiography and
environmental health, the vacancy rates are at the higher levels.
19.I.3.18 Per capita Government spending was US$26 in 1997,
which is well above the US$12 per capita assumed as the minimal threshold by
international organisations for a basic primary health care package. However,
biases occur in the allocation of resources, thus reducing the efficacy of
Government expenditure, for example, the stated priority of Primary Health Care
is under-funded, the major bias being towards hospital services all over the
country. Indeed, in 1998, as much as 35 percent of total recurrent Government
expenditures on health was allocated to the Public Hospital in Georgetown. The
Regional budget for health was 25 percent.
19.I.3.19 The University of Guyana and the Liliendaal Annex of
the MOH undertake almost all health-related training. UG offers curricula in
medicine, pharmacy, medical technology, radiography, environmental health,
health sciences tutoring, and health service management. In collaboration with
the Institute of Adult Learning and Continuing Education, evening classes for
health professionals are offered in mental health, developmental psychology,
care of the elderly, and childcare.
19.I.3.20 The Liliendaal Annex manages a variety of clinical
and technical health education programmes, including professional education for
those who intend to work as Medex personnel, nurses, X-ray technicians, dental
auxiliaries, laboratory aides, community health workers, physiotherapy
assistants, pharmacy assistants and nursing aides. It also offers a public
health nursing programme. The Health Education programme of the Ministry of
Health includes two nursing schools that are attached to the public hospitals of
Georgetown and New Amsterdam. The Linden Hospital Complex operates a nursing
school (Charles Rose Nursing School), and internal training is provided at the
St. Joseph’s Mercy Hospital (private).
19.I.3.21 GUYSUCO provides diagnostic and outpatient services
for their employees and their dependants, and some of them also have NIS
coverage. GUYSUCO also carries out preventive activities through the annual
screening of all employees, family planning, and immunisation through
collaborative actions with the Ministry of Health. For example, GUYSUCO and the
Ministry of Health joined their efforts for the implementation of the Yellow
Fever and MMR Immunisation Campaign launched by the Ministry at the beginning of
1999. As noted, the quality of GUYSUCO’s health services is generally high.
19.II ISSUES AND CONSTRAINTS
19.II.1 Twelve and one-half percent of Guyana’s population does
not have access to any health care. The situation is proportionally more severe
for the lower-income groups. For example, among the lowest group twenty-four
percent of the ill or injured does not seek medical care "due to expense or
distance factors"; in the next lowest, the corresponding figure was nineteen
percent; but in the highest it was only three percent.
19.II.2 The most important factors affecting the demand side of
health care utilisation are the distance and travel time to a health facility,
the perceived quality of the care, the education level of the patient, the type
and severity of the illness and the out of pocket expenditures for health. The
price of the service plays an important role, but is not the only determinant of
health services demand.
19.II.3 The poor quality of the care offered at the lower
levels has encouraged many patients to by-pass the referral system and seek care
directly at the higher levels, thus causing the break-down of the referral
system.
19.II.4 Overall, both structural and process quality is poor.
In spite of recent increases in financing and improvements in management, the
health sector still operates with vacancies in several key positions, and with
malfunctioning and obsolescent equipment. Storage facilities for drugs are
inadequate, as are quality control standards and implementation. Patients
routinely purchase their own pharmaceuticals and medical supplies and are forced
to spend excessively long time in repeated visits to medical facilities.
Moreover, the overall quality of operations has not improved. Indeed, in some
respects they continue to decline. In large part this is due to problems in the
institutional structure of the sector, in its management practices, and in the
unavailability of adequate financing.
19.II.5 Health services are not responsive to users,
particularly those most in need, thus resulting in increased inequity. In
addition, poor accountability to users undermines the responsiveness of the
system.
19.II.6 Both allocative and technical inefficiencies plague
the sector, particularly the public health sector. Allocative inefficiencies
derive from the fact that resources are not allocated to the services that are
most cost-effective. Technical inefficiencies result from an inefficient
utilisation of those areas in which facilities are adequate. Unit costs of
facilities at all levels are high.
19.II.7 Institutional responsibility for the public sector
system of health care is dispersed among too many Ministries and agencies. Under
the present system, the operational responsibility for the implementation of the
Ministry of Health’s policy lies with the Regional Health Officer (RHO). The RHO
reports to the Regional Executive Officer (REO), who also has the financial
authority and responsibility for programmes in all sectors. The REO, however, is
not accountable to the policy-making Ministries. The Ministry of Health,
therefore, has virtually no downstream control on the implementation of its
policies. There is no mechanism to hold the REO accountable for the delivery of
the sectoral programmes. The restructuring of institutional responsibilities
should therefore be a key component of the institutional reforms of the public
health care system.
19.II.8 Although Guyana’s public expenditure on health has
increased significantly during the 1990s, because the system had deteriorated
resources remain below the levels necessary to restore it to the desired state.
If national health priorities are to be properly addressed, adequate funding for
them is vital. There is also a compelling need to improve financial management,
so that the available funds are used more efficiently.
19.II.9 There is difficulty in establishing the overall
resources needed in the public health sector because budgets are not based on
actual cost estimates or productivity criteria.
19.II.10 There is a scarcity of qualified and experienced
professionals in health care accounting and financial management.
19.II.11 Salaries in the public health care sector are still
well below those that are offered in the private sector. Moreover, perhaps as a
result, absenteeism of medical personnel is a major concern. Furthermore, those
reforms that are intended, under the Highly Indebted Poor Countries Initiative,
to upgrade salaries up to 80 per cent of private sector levels, have not yet
been implemented. In addition, more flexible and efficient personnel policies
are required.
19.II.12 In principle, the referral system is well-suited to
Guyana because of the geographic barriers to communications and transport.
However, in practice it is not functioning well. Technical inefficiencies, and
the failure to provide adequately trained medical staff, supplies and equipment
at the lower level induce patients to bypass the system and seek care in the
National Public Hospital, or in private hospitals concentrated in the Georgetown
area. In a cruel irony, it is the poor who visit in disproportionate numbers the
local facilities and endure the consequences of lower-quality care.
19.II.13 The principal administrative and managerial reasons
why the referral system is not working as planned appear to be the following:
the lack of sufficient administrative co-ordination between the Ministry of
Health and the Regional authorities; shortages of funding; technical and
allocative inefficiencies; the inability of the Ministry of Health to provide
leadership to the Regions; the lack of authority in the Ministry of Health to
implement policies or to set the budgets of the Regional Administrations; the
lack of training in public health or in administration of Regional Health
Offices; the failure continues to pass on patients’ files to higher stages of
the system. Indeed the failure to keep files on them; and the fact that in some
parts of some Regions, it is easier to travel to Georgetown than to the
appropriate health facility in the Region.
19.II.14 The spatial distribution of health centres is
critical, for they provide a wide range of preventive services and some curative
care. However, those in Regions 3, 4 and 6 cater to at least twice as many
people as in the other regions. And yet, a distribution of health centres based
on the population to be catered for would be highly inequitable. Inefficiencies
in the spatial distribution of health centres are somehow inevitable given the
geographical features of the Guyanese territory and the difficulties of
travelling. A trade-off between equity and efficiency seems therefore to exist
in that what is an equitable spatial distribution of health centres does not
necessary constitute the most efficient solution. The proposals which have been
put forward in the Chapter on the Transport sector would go a long way towards
the resolution of this difficulty.
19.II.15 It is widely recognised that the supply and
distribution of pharmaceuticals and medical supplies is a major bottleneck in
the health care system. There are periodic shortages vis-à-vis needs, delivery
is often not timely, and wastage frequently occurs because of poor management.
There is obviously a need to correlate estimates of annual drug requirements,
procurement, distribution and the allocation of adequate financing. It is also
necessary to provide adequate storage facilities, and effective security to
prevent the leakage of drugs and other supplies to the private market. An
increase of salaries might reduce this transfer of assets from the public to the
private sector.
19.II.16 There is an absence of standard treatment protocols
for drug use in treatment of common diseases.
19.II.17 There is a gross insufficiency of qualified
pharmacists within the public system.
19.II.18 Storage facilities are inadequate and in many cases
not suitable to the storage of drugs both at central and regional levels. In
addition, part of the space that is available is taken up by expired drugs,
drugs that should be destroyed because of their poor condition, and by unused
medical equipment.
19.II.19 There is no comprehensive management information
system for pharmaceuticals and other supplies in use at the Pharmacy Bond.
19.II.20 Planning is inadequate. In the Regions, planning for
health services is often the responsibility of managers with no expertise in the
health sector. Strategic plans for health services development in the Regions
are not produced regularly and the planning of outreach activities is minimal.
Decision-making is rarely based on supporting evidence. On the contrary,
decisions are often made as a crisis response rather than as a result of a
rational planning process. There are no mechanisms through which data on the
health status of the population and the incidence of particular diseases and
syndromes can be channelled into the decision-making process.
19.II.21 The unavailability of qualified personnel is one of
the major weaknesses of the public health system. Moreover, the available staff
is not optimally distributed. Major problems occur especially in certain key
areas, such as pharmacy, laboratory technology, radiography and environmental
health. In addition, the shortage of nurses, who form by far the largest
percentage of the work force and are the backbone of the health sector, severely
hampers the ability of the system to deliver quality care. There is also a
dearth of medical specialist staff and other technical health professionals. As
a result, the ratio of physicians and nurses to population is still unacceptably
low in some Regions, especially in Regions 1, 5, 8, 9 and 10.
19.II.22 The management of the system is poor and most
personnel in key positions lack managerial training and planning expertise.
Difficulties are experienced in the recruitment, retention, training, deployment
and utilisation of staff. The development and management of human resources is
still not approached in a systematic and organised fashion. The major factors
contributing to the public health sector’s inability to attract, recruit and
retain staff within the public health system are as follows: low incentives
(salaries and employment benefits), unappealing working conditions, the lack of
career development systems; limited opportunities for in-service training, a
general shortage of adequately trained teaching staff and teaching-related
materials, and the absence of a comprehensive human resources development and
management plan.
19.II.23 The shortage of physicians is not necessarily a
shortage in numbers. Rather, the problem is one of poor distribution since most
physicians prefer to practise in Georgetown and surrounding areas. However there
is a definite shortage of specialist physicians. Nursing shortages include both
a dearth in absolute numbers and a lack of specialist such as anaesthetic,
psychiatric and paediatric nurses. Services in health-related fields such as
medical technologists, pharmacists and radiographers are most critical.
19.II.24 The lack of adequately designed rewarding systems
for health care workers serving the interior mostly account for the inability to
attract personnel to these areas. Hinterland conditions are poor, infrastructure
and educational facilities for families inadequate, and the cost of living is
generally higher than in Georgetown. Better incentives will need to be designed.
19.II.25 Health education and training systems for all types of
health workers are inadequate and not always efficient. There is an absolute
shortage of personnel in certain positions, which could be addressed through the
enhancement of training activities. But there is an all-pervading absence of
suitably trained educators and trainers.
19.II.26 Distance learning, which could amplify the coverage of
programmes and of in-service training, has not been developed thoroughly. In the
past, distance education was used for the continuous on-the-job training of
medexes serving the interior, through weekly radio communication. The process
was, however, discontinued because of the disrepair and poor maintenance of the
radio equipment. Distance education would not only increase incentives for
people to stay in the interior, but also would assist to retrain and upgrade
staff’s skills. New health learning materials also need to be developed.
19.II.2 Buildings and Equipment
19.II.2.1 Guyana’s health infrastructure is very old and many
buildings are in need of repair. The condition of the equipment is also poor
because of its age and the lack of maintenance. The utilisation rate of the
public facilities, especially at Health Centres and Health Posts, is very low.
This is due mainly to the shortage of supplies, equipment, and health personnel;
to the high hidden costs for the users (lengthy transportation, and waiting
time); and to the relative inaccessibility of the Centres and Posts
19.II.2.2 The successful implementation of vertical programmes
such as vector control, sexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDS, Hansen's
disease, tuberculosis, dental services and veterinary public health is severely
hampered in Guyana because of the institutional factors related to the existing
Regional system. In addition the programmes are constrained by over-stretched
staff at the central level; insufficient support and field staff; inadequate
inter-institutional co-ordination in programmes such as malaria control; and
inadequate supplies of reagents, drugs and equipment.
19.III SECTORAL OBJECTIVES
19.III.1 In the broadest sense, the objectives of the sector
are to increase the length of healthy life for all people in Guyana, and to
reduce health disparities among social groups. Put in another way, the
objectives are to ensure that, increasingly, most Guyanese enjoy a better
quality of life, and to minimise the incidence of illnesses and disabilities. To
this end, the focus will be on primary health care and the promotion of
preventive health measures.
19.III.2 The overall operational objectives for attaining these
goals are to improve the population’s access to health care and the
quality of the care that is offered, while ensuring that the health
services are provided cost-effectively.
19.III.3 The question of access is double-sided. From the
perspective of supply, improving access requires increasing the availability of
health services and ensuring that these services are responsive to the needs and
preferences of the clientele at all levels of the delivery system. From the
perspective of demand, improved access requires the reduction in the household
costs of accessing care (i.e. of reducing all direct and hidden costs).
19.IV THE STRATEGY
19.IV.1 Administration and Management
Ministry of Health
19.IV.1.1 The Ministry of Health will be responsible for health
policy formulation, health planning, and monitoring and regulating the health
sector.
19.IV.1.2 The Ministry of Health will develop the capacity to
prepare service agreements, monitor their implementation and assess the
performance of devolved authorities.
19.IV.1.3 The Ministry of Health will be restructured to
reflect the decentralisation of service delivery functions. It will operate
in a regulatory capacity over the entire health sector, rather than in its
traditional role as the centralised manager of the public health system. Service
delivery and management responsibilities will be devolved to the health
authorities and other agencies, which will report to the Ministry of Health. In
the re-structured Ministry, the following functions will be retained and
strengthened centrally: the development of policies and strategies; the
allocation of resources; the establishment of objectives; the review of
performance; regulation setting; and research and development.
19.IV.1.4 Legislation will be introduced to require
allied-health-field personnel to register with a Paramedical Professional
Council which will be established.
19.IV.1.5 Procurement of all pharmaceuticals and supplies
for the public sector will be contracted out. A Procurement Board in charge of
procurement and distribution of drugs and medical supplies will be established
for this purpose.
19.IV.1.6 The Procurement Board will be autonomous and
managed according to business principles. Private physicians and facilities
would be able to purchase drugs and supplies from the Board. The Board will be
required to carry out an assessment of needs for pharmaceuticals and supplies in
the entire system, to procure them, to deliver them in required quantities to
facilities in all regions of the country, and to assure their quality and their
safe storage prior to delivery to the purchaser.
19.IV.1.7 All devolved Authorities will arrange their own
purchases of drugs and supplies from the Board, and will negotiate prices taking
into account transport costs.
Regional Health Authorities
19.IV.1.8 Regional Health Authorities (RHAs) will be
established. These will be decentralised public bodies with the responsibility
for health service delivery. They will assume responsibilities for operating and
maintaining those health facilities that are now under the aegis of the Regional
Administrations.
19.IV.1.9 The Regional Health Authorities and hospitals will be
operated by Boards.
19.IV.1.10 The Boards of the RHAs will be autonomous. They will
comprise members of the Guyana Medical Association, ex officio
representatives of the Ministry of Health, with a preponderance of
representatives of the Regional government and local communities.
Human Resources
19.IV.1.11 The health personnel of the RHA’s will report to
a Ministry Director or functionary: The Regional Authorities will account
for their performance to an appropriate functionary at the central Ministry of
Health.
19.IV.1.12 All Senior Regional Officers will be trained in
health administration, by way of a structured training programme which the
Ministry of Health will establish.
19.IV.1.13 Salaries in the sector will be increased. Special
attention will be paid to the need to provide incentives for well-qualified
medical and administrative personnel to serve in the hinterland facilities.
19.IV.1.14 In order to increase the flexibility of the
public health system, the salary structures of health personnel will be
de-linked from the public service. In addition, a set of special categories for
health personnel will be developed.
19.IV.1.15 All personnel in key management positions, e.g.,
programme managers, hospital administrators, district-level health officers,
medical superintendents, and public health nurse supervisors, will have adequate
training in health administration.
19.IV.1.16 A manpower plan for the health sector that indicates
ways to upgrade and improve staffing levels and analyses alternatives to
overcome the shortage of specialist personnel such as medical technologists,
pharmacists, dental technologists, radiographers and X-ray technicians will be
developed.
19.IV.1.17 Adequate incentives will be developed in order to
stimulate the service of health personnel in the hinterland. In order to
overcome the problems of staffing, all persons trained by the Government in
medical disciplines and allied fields will be asked to serve in an interior
location for two years. Training local people, as in the case of the Community
Health Workers, has already proved a successful strategy, and will be
strengthened also in the case of extension personnel, such as Medex and Dentex.
Outreach activities will be further expanded to increase access to health
services in remote areas.
19.IV.1.18 Pre- and in-service recruitment and training plans
will be developed and implemented in order to meet the manpower needs of the
health system. At present there is no linkage between the needs of the sector
and the structure of the training programmes.
19.IV.1.19 Physicians will be trained in the role of medical
extension personnel and primary health care. Where such training is not
otherwise available, it will be provided on an in-service basis.
19.IV.1.20 The education and training of health professionals
will be updated and evaluated in order to assess the appropriateness of existing
curricula and course requirements.
19.IV.1.21 Mechanisms will be put in place to ensure
collaboration between the Liliendaal Annex, the University of Guyana, and the
Ministry of Health on the development of curricula in order to guarantee
consistency and relevance to the sector's needs.
Health programmes
19.IV.1.22 A division of primary health care will be
established in the Ministry of Health, to work in close co-operation with
the Regional units, where most of the primary care is provided.
19.IV.1.23 The Ministry will develop a strong Epidemiology
department to undertake on-going health needs assessment, direct and assist
health authorities and other devolved agencies to identify the health needs of
their populations; and assess their effectiveness in satisfying these needs.
19.IV.1.24 The Ministry will institute a mechanism to monitor
the quality of health care provided in both the public and private health
sectors. Quality assurance programmes will be developed. This will include
clinical and organisational audit, and the development of multidisciplinary
quality assurance programmes and quality standards.
19.IV.1.25 Arms length and outreach activities will also be
strengthened, including the use of mobile clinics.
19.IV.1.26 The institutional and functional capacity of the
Government Analyst Department will be reorganised and strengthened so that the
quality of drugs manufactured, imported and sold in Guyana might be
ascertained.
Facilities and Services
19.IV.1.27 A detailed survey will be carried out to verify
whether all the existing facilities of the five-tiered referral system are
needed, and what is their current status.
19.IV.1.28 Hospitals, that are currently underutilised, will
be closed. Funds could in this way be made available to upgrade other
‘strategic’ facilities, as well as to provide a fleet of ambulances and other
transport facilities, to ensure that radio communication networks are available
in all localities, and to finance an expansion of a programme of rotating
visits.
19.IV.1.29 In addition, depending upon the results of the
survey some of the health centers, especially those in coastal areas, might be
closed. The funds released by this process will be utilised to strengthen
selected District hospitals and establish more health posts in remote areas.
19.IV.1.30 Following the survey mentioned above, a master
plan for the rehabilitation of facilities, including the acquisition and
maintenance of an improved fleet of air and river ambulances, will be developed
by the Ministry of Health.
19.IV.1.31 Every regional hospital and other district
hospitals will have at least one ambulance for emergencies.
19.IV.1.32 All health centers will be equipped with a phone
or radio for emergency calls.
19.IV.1.33 All hospitals will have adequate power generation
supplies.
19.IV.1.34 Health posts will be maintained and improved, as
they are vital for the tasks of medical education, preventive care and arranging
for medical transport to other facilities.
19.IV.1.35 An essential Medical Supplies list will be
formulated outlining types and specifications of supplies that will be stocked.
19.IV.1.36 Investments will be made to improve the storage
facilities for pharmaceuticals in public hospitals, health centres and health
posts.
19.IV.1.37 The programmes of rotating visits to the remotest
facilities by physicians will be strengthened, so that villagers would know in
advance when a doctor would be in the nearest health centre, for example on
specified days of the month.
19.IV.1.38 Arrangements will be made for teams of foreign
medical specialists, who are qualified in disciplines in which Guyana is in
short supply, to visit the country in order to examine and treat
patients.
19.IV.1.39 A Cancer Centre, headed by an oncologist, and
provided with supporting staff, will be established.
19.IV.1.40 Dialysis equipment will be installed in order to
provide assistance to patients suffering from relevant kidney disorders.
19.IV.1.41 The services of the Medical Faculty at the
University of Guyana will be expanded and upgraded through the utilisation of
Information Technology, and the linkages which will be established with a
network of foreign universities both in the Caribbean and further afield.
Through these Internet connections, Guyanese students will be able to undertake
practical courses abroad.
19.IV.I.42 Information Technology will also be utilised
extensively in the health sector, in administration, the procurement of medical
supplies, in the co-ordination of the referral system, and in the
rationalisation of the relationships between the central government and the
region.
Financing
19.IV.I.43 Funding will be allocated to RHAs on the basis of
service agreements negotiated with the Ministry of Health. Mechanisms to ensure
financial accountability for public health will be put in place.
19.IV.1.44 Hospitals operated by parastatals which
receive budgetary allocations willl operate under similar service agreements.
As the quality of the national health system improves, and the parastatals
focus increasingly on their own financial requirements, a transfer of their
hospitals to the national public system will be undertaken.
19.IV.1.45 Financial reforms will proceed in parallel with
institutional reforms, in order to make expenditure on health care more
effective.
19.IV.1.46 The Central Government's budget will continue to
be the principal source of funding for the public system of health care.
Government health expenditure will reach 5 percent of GDP by the year 2002 and
will increase progressively to 10 percent of GDP by the year 2010.
19.IV.1.47 General taxation will remain the main
funding mechanism for health in Guyana. However, earmarked health taxes
will be levied from the year 2003 when it is projected that the economy would be
more robust.
19.IV.1.48 Resources will be allocated from the centre to
devolved authorities on the basis of a funding formula. Public resources will be
prioritised to highly cost effective services, such as primary health care
(services like immunisation, sanitation, vector control, diagnosis and treatment
of tuberculosis, malaria, sexually transmitted diseases, the provision of
maternal and child care, health education, and public health interventions).
19.IV.1.49 Cost recovery mechanisms will not be
directed to financing the health requirements of the vulnerable. Cost
recovery will be utilised only for services for which public resources are
inadequate, because they have been already allocated to other priority or
essential health services. Indeed, user fees for well-defined services are
currently charged at certain public care institutions. These include the Public
Hospital Georgetown,(private rooms, pregnancy tests and physiotherapy services),
at two Regional hospitals (X-rays mortuary service, laboratory tests), at the
National Dental Care Centre (all treatments), at the Ptolomey Reid
Rehabilitation Centre (for Orthotic and Prosthetic Appliances and hearing aids),
at the National Blood Transfusion Centre, and at the Food and Drugs
Administration. For other services, selective payments by patients will be
imposed.
19.IV.1.50 Within a system of selective fees for medical
services, cost recovery will never hinder access to health care and no patient
will be refused service because of the inability to pay fees.
19.IV.1.51 Financial contributions to complement the public
budget will be sought from communities, or through Community Hospital
Associations. This approach will also enable the communities to have a greater
role in planning health services and monitoring their quality.
19.IV.1.52 The government will develop further a health
insurance scheme as a supplementary financing option.
19.IV.1.53 An extensive review of the NIS and a
corresponding reform programme will be developed, in order to improve the NIS
actuarial basis and strengthen its performance as a provider of social health
benefits.
19.IV.1.54 A modest registration fee for both
inpatients and outpatients will be charged at the Public Hospital Georgetown,
and will be introduced in all district and regional hospitals from the year
2003, after the quality of service in these areas will have been
improved.
19.IV.1.55 Fees for patients bypassing the referral
system will also be charged from 2003, in order to avoid the overuse of
upper-level facilities for care that could have been provided effectively at
lower levels. Such a system of fees requires a definition of the rules governing
the referral system and the establishment of adequate incentives and
disincentives for providers of services at lower levels. These requirements will
be met.
19.IV.1.56 At the Public Hospital Georgetown, already
existing charges (e.g., physiotherapy, the use of private wards, the
medical library, pregnancy tests) will be increased to reflect the real value of
the resources necessary to provide the services.
19.IV.1.57 Fees will also be levied for other services,
including laboratory procedures, X-Rays services, other specialised diagnostic
services (e.g., CT), specialised surgery, medications. The application of some
of these fees will be subject to a means test.
19.IV.1.58 The sale of services to the private sector will
be extended. Existing charges for services sold to the private sector
at the Food & Drug Administration and at the Blood Bank will be
increased.
19.IV.1.59 The utilisation of equipment and facilities at
the ACSD unit at the Public Hospital Georgetown will be optimised by allowing
private doctors to use equipment in public hospitals on payment of a fee,
subject to scheduling their use so that priority is given to the public
physicians. Charges for patients admitted to public hospitals while under the
care of private physicians will be imposed.
19.IV.1.60 Services for which excess capacity exists will
be sold to the private sector. At the PHG these include, for example,
non-clinical services such as the laundry, the kitchen, and the sterilisation
unit.
19.IV.1.61 The tentative arrangements that have already been
negotiated with CARICOM countries for the complementary utilisation of each
other’s medical facilities and services will be finalised. To this end, a
special fund will be established to expedite the evacuation of indigent patients
to Caribbean countries for treatment in those ailments for which services are
not available in Guyana.
19.IV.1.62 No charges will be made for preventive and
primary health care at the commmunity level. This will encourage the population
to give greater emphasis to seeking adequate preventive care.
19.IV.1.63 The establishment of cost recovery measures poses
serious challenges in terms of public sector ‘capacity’. Several
administrative and legal issues need to be resolved in order for the system
described above to work effectively. The health sector will complete
effectively a process of institutional strengthening in order to tackle these
problems.
Health Promotion and Protection
19.IV.1.64 Programmes addressing gender specific health
issues, for example, in the areas of reproductive health, the impact of STDs and
HIV/AIDS, and cancer will be developed.
19.IV.1.65 Gender sensitivity analysis will also be included
in the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of all health
programmes.
19.IV.1.66 Information systems will be designed to provide
adequate gender-differentiated information in support of policy and decision
making processes.
19.IV.1.67 The curricula of schools will be reviewed to ensure
that health education forms an integral part.
19.IV.1.68 Adolescent health issues will be tackled through
educational programmes within schools, in collaboration with school welfare
departments and social workers.
19.IV.1.69 Public awareness programmes to sensitise people
about the dangers of smoking will be strengthened.
19.IV.1.70 Education on nutrition and healthy lifestyles will
be brought into schools. Campaigns to reach the entire population will also be
strengthened.
19.IV.1.71 Improved nutritional care will be provided in
hospitals, through the recruitment of dieticians and the provision of diet
counselling.
19.IV.1.72 Monitoring of the nutritional status of the
population, especially the most vulnerable groups, will be carried out on a
regular basis.
19.IV.1.73 The vector control programme will be revised and
modified to become a ‘National Advisory Board’, with the tasks of monitoring,
research, emergency and crisis response, and the preparation of technical
guidelines for guidance in the execution of programmes.
19.IV.1.74 Extensive inclusion of the community in the
management of these diseases and vectors will form an Integral part of a
national control policy to have effect. Such a policy will be prepared.
19.IV.1.75 STDs and HIV/AIDS constitute priority areas for
health intervention in Guyana. The "National HIV/AIDS Prevention Plan,
1999-2001" recently prepared by the Ministry of Health will be thoroughly
implemented, and rolled over, and funding from local and international
organisations will be secured accordingly.
19.IV.1.76 Measures to treat all the population suffering from
acute respiratory infections will be strengthened in all affected areas.
19.IV.1.77 Health education will become an integral part of the
day-to-day health services given to patients and the community. These include
the strengthening of counselling and informational services given to patients.
Vulnerable Groups
19.IV.1.78 A social assessment system to determine
eligibility to exemptions will be established. Until such a system is in place,
means assessments will be carried out at public health facility level.
19.IV.1.79 Inequalities in access to health care are of
particular burden to the poorest categories. The Ministry of Health will examine
ways to improve the provision and delivery, of services to these groups. The
health needs of vulnerable groups are concentrated in the areas of nutritional
problems, poor environmental health, vector-borne diseases and sexually
transmitted diseases. Hence a health development strategy centered on the
objectives of primary health care and health promotion will be designed and
implemented to address the needs of the most vulnerable.
19.IV.1.80 While institutional reforms in the public health
sector pursue objectives of equity, access and quality improvements of health
services, an explicit stance will be taken to target the most needy.
19.IV.1.81 Policy documents addressing the health needs of each
vulnerable group and detailing the action plans as well as institutional
responsibilities will be prepared through processes of national consultation,
involving all major social actors. This has been the case, for example, of the
National Consultation on HIV/AIDS, which took place in November 1998 and was
developed into a policy document and the National Plan for HIV/AIDS Prevention,
1999-2001.
19.IV.1.82 Besides the preparation of ‘basic package’ of
services targeting Primary Health Care interventions, to be made accessible to
the entire population, the Ministry of Health will design extra basic packages
for needy groups. The institutional responsibilities for the delivery of such
packages will be assigned through a process of consultation.
19.IV.1.83 Financing mechanisms, including those for cost
recovery, will not be implemented unless they are accompanied by exemption
policies and mechanisms targeting the most needy (the elderly, disabled, etc.),
other categories of the medically indigent, and the poor (e.g.,: the employed
poor, falling in the group of people at minimum wage; the unemployed;
single-parent or single-earner households; the homeless; the youth with no
formal education and no job).
19.IV.1.84 Special health needs of vulnerable groups will be
identified and attributed adequate priority. For example the availability of
drugs and access to physicians for the elderly, currently poor, is essential for
the wellbeing of this vulnerable category.
19.IV.I.85 Targeting groups with certain well-identified health
needs will help addressing their poverty status.
|